Prime Minister Right To Reject Divisive ‘Voice’ Referendum

Share this edition:

“Reports that Prime Minister Scott Morrison would veto a divisive indigenous-only ‘voice to parliament’ represents a win for the principle that all Australians are equal,” said Daniel Wild, Director of Research at the free market think tank the Institute of Public Affairs.

“This position affirms the democratic values on which Australia was founded. The Australian Constitution should treat all Australian citizens as individuals, with equal rights and equal responsibilities.”

“This represents a repudiation of a divisive ideology based on race. Race has no place in the Australian Constitution.”

“If the government chooses to pursue any changes to the constitution it should remove the provisions that currently refer to race – section 25, and section 51 (xxvi),” said Mr Wild.

For media and comment: Evan Mulholland, Director of Communications, on 0405 140 780, or at [email protected] 

Daniel Wild

Daniel Wild is a Deputy Executive Director at the Institute of Public Affairs
Stay up to date

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date with the IPA’s work

Support the IPA

If you liked what you read, consider supporting the IPA. We are entirely funded by individual supporters like you.

Related Posts

Chris Bowen’s net zero obsession renders his new domestic gas reservation proposal next to redundant

The Albanese government has just put a band-aid on the domestic gas...

Australia’s borrowing binge is about to get expensive

We can’t control the global forces pushing bond yields higher, but our...

Australia’s Future With Tony Abbott – Fake outrage fuels Hanson; Canberra’s “truth deficit”; War with China

See below for show notes: In this episode recorded on 15 September...

Whyalla’s net zero wipeout

“The net zero agenda has claimed another victim with the critical Whyalla...