Submission: Inquiry Into Penalty Rates

Share this edition:

Recent IPA research shows that penalty rates were introduced in order to deter weekend work. Overtime, the justification of penalty rates has shifted to being a compensatory measure. As preferences and circumstances have changed over time, the need for additional compensation for weekend and public holiday work has also changed. On this basis, the recent decision of the Fair Work Commission to reduce prohibitive penalty rates in some industries reflects this wider trend.

The IPA considers that centralised mandated penalty rates are an outdated penalty on jobs. The IPA’s submission is that the Committee should recommend changes that would empower employers and employees to directly negotiate their own penalty rates. Additionally, the IPA submits that the various legislative proposals before the parliament are misguided because the bills seek to make the system more centralised and less flexible – moves that will have a negative impact employment and the economy.

To download the submission click here

Below is an extract of Aaron Lane’s appearance at the Senate Inquiry into Penalty Rates.

 

Stay up to date

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date with the IPA’s work

Support the IPA

If you liked what you read, consider supporting the IPA. We are entirely funded by individual supporters like you.

Related Posts

Victoria faces economic stagnation as US state Indiana thrives on low debt and taxes

After a week in Indianapolis, I’ve become even more upset with Australia’s...

Adam Creighton on Sharri News24 – 22 October 2026

Sharri Markson: Thanks for tuning in and the Ben Robert Smith interview...

Energy security mess puts whole country at risk

Australians with fond memories of Bali holidays are concerned by recent videos...

Adam Creighton on Mornings with Chris Smith 2SM – 22 October 2026

Chris Smith: He’s the chief economist at the Institute of Public Affairs,...