Institute of Public Affairs Submission to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters inquiry into the conduct of the 2025 federal election

Share this edition:

Dear Committee Secretary,

The purpose of this letter is to share research and analysis conducted by the Institute of Public Affairs (“the IPA”) with the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters (“the Committee”) as it inquires into all aspects of the conduct of the 2025 federal election and related matters.

The terms of reference require the Committee to examine, among other issues:

  • assessment and review of the purported increase in incidents of aggressive conduct, deliberate obstruction, and intimidating behaviour towards voters, political participants, volunteers, and Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) officials;
  • potential reform of safety and security arrangements, including consideration of the powers, processes, and capacity of the AEC to manage and address increasingly threatening or disruptive behaviour;
  • the suitability and potential reform of measures to ensure universal voter access, including polling booth availability and location, early voting, remote polling, and postal voting arrangements; and
  • the suitability of the current authorisation framework and requirements, having regard to the evolution of communication methods and technology.

 The Special Minister of State has also asked the Committee to consider the interaction with the following:

  • the implementation and operation of the electoral reform passed by the 47th Parliament, particularly regarding the use of money or capital in the most recent election;
  • reforms to address the ongoing threats of interference in our electoral system, both foreign and domestic; and
  • the composition of the Parliament as a whole, including: the length of the parliamentary term; the potential for fixed terms; and the number of elected representatives relative to the growth in population and the electorate.

The IPA welcomes this opportunity to provide comment, particularly in relation to:

  1. The size of Parliament;
  2. The effect of preferential voting on the composition of parliament; and
  3. Proposals for fixed parliamentary terms.

Morgan Begg

Morgan Begg is the Director, Research at the Institute of Public Affairs

Mia Schlicht

Mia Schlicht was a Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs
Stay up to date

Sign up to our newsletter to stay up to date with the IPA’s work

Support the IPA

If you liked what you read, consider supporting the IPA. We are entirely funded by individual supporters like you.

Related Posts

Education ‘industry’ not the bonanza we’re sold

When I was a teenager starting to take an interest in economics,...

Adam Creighton on Sharri News24 – 10 September 2026

Steve Price: Okay. Joining me now, IPA Chief Economist Adam Creighton and...

Daniel Wild on Credlin News24 – 10 September 2026

Peta Credlin: Thank you. Let’s go now to my Panel, National Affairs...

Labor’s digital duty of care privatises political censorship

Political elites have much to fear from the ‘little-people’ talking among themselves....